Home/Posts/Dream Time Limits on a Qantas Boeing Dreamliner

Dream Time Limits on a Qantas Boeing Dreamliner

Qantas is testing record-breaking, 19-hour flights from JFK to Sidney.

Although the direct flights substantially decrease total travel time, they stress passengers’ and crews’ physical limits. In order to convince regulators that the flights are safe, Qantas is assessing the impact of extended duty times on its pilots and taking steps to minimize jet lag. The commercial viability of this technological breakthrough will depend on people’s tolerance for discomfort.


Video Spotlight: Fighting Jet Lag on a 19-Hour Flight


This post is based on the NBCnews.com article, Doing the ‘Macarena’ at 2 a.m. on Qantas’ Record-Breaking 19-Hour Flight, by T. Costello, October 21, 2019, and the YouTube video, What a 19-Hour Nonstop Flight Can Teach Us About Jet Lagby the Wall Street Journal, October 21, 2019. Image source: kasto/123RF/Matej Kastelic.

Discussion Questions:

1. For passengers, what are the advantages and disadvantages of taking the 19-hour flight?

Guidance: The advantages include decreased travel time with no layovers, more comfortable seating, larger windows, and pleasant ambient lighting in the Boeing 777x or Airbus A350-1000 planes that will be used for these flights. The disadvantages include physical discomfort and health risks from dehydration and limited movement, jet lag, safety risks due to crew fatigue, and higher ticket prices.

2. What potential problems does the crew face? How can they be alleviated?

Guidance: There will be two teams of pilots on board. Not only will the pilots have extended duty times, but they will also have limited opportunities for rest and exercise. Although the article does not mention flight attendants, they will have to work longer hours with additional food service and cleaning duties. They will also have to deal with passengers growing more irritable and demanding as time passes. To minimize these challenges, the crew should have several days off before and after each long flight. They should also have spacious and comfortable sleep areas. Their meals should be light and nutritious.

3. The Concorde flew passengers from Paris to New York at supersonic speed but turned out to be a commercial failure. Do you foresee a similar fate for the Qantas 19-hour flights?

Guidance: A flight on the Concorde was a luxurious experience, but the round trip ticket price was $7,995 ($12,500 in 2018 dollars).  A round-trip, business class ticket on the Singapore Airlines 19-hour flight from Newark to Singapore is approximately $5,100. Qantas prices for the long flight will have to be competitive. Therefore, it is unlikely that pricing will be a major obstacle to the success of this travel option. However, the challenge for Qantas will be to offer an experience superior to that on flights with layovers to compensate for the extra cost and added discomfort.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
steven dickstein
steven dickstein
1 year ago

There is a bit of confusion here as the article headline refers to the Dreamliner or 787. The Guidance for question #1 then switches the model to the 777X, which will not be introduced until 2021.

Corinne Karuppan
Corinne Karuppan
1 year ago

The test flights are done on a Boeing 787. As mentioned in the article, Qantas plans to use the Boeing 777x or the Airbus A350-1000 once the non-stop flight to Sidney is greenlighted.

Who Holds the Record? The Man or the Shoes?
Party Continues for Fiesta China